| Sean's profileTablet of the HeartBlogListsNetwork | Help |
|
January 30 HeroesI am inspired! One of my heroes in this world is William Wilberforce. After being converted to Christ as a young politician he set the course of his life to accomplish one goal - overthrowing the slave trade in England. He started as a young man and was defeated year after year after year though serving many decades as a politician. Yet, he persevered. Let it be said that this man destroyed a hideous and lucrative institution through persevering faith. In loving labor, he devoted his life in service to others - both the kidnapping of Africans and the destruction of the soul-destroying practices of the British. You see, if a person truly knows what it means to be unshackled from the bondage of his own soul, he sets it as his goal to set other people free as well. William Wilberforce has a movie describing his life and work to overthrow the slave trade. It comes out February 23. I plan to go with our Young Adults to see this movie on opening night. Go see it, and you will be inspired. Resources: YouTube preview (or go to MySpace): January 26 MySpace JunkieI have entered the realm of MySpace, though for the time being, this will be my primary place of writing. To see MySpace, click here. It is a work in progress. Choosing a BibleActs 8:37
KJV:
"And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God." - Acts 8:37
NKJV:
"Then Philip said, “If you believe with all your heart, you may.” And he answered and said, “I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.”" - Acts 8:37
NIV:
NOT PRESENT, however, the margin note to verse 36 says, "Some late manuscripts baptized?” Philip said, ``If you believe with all your heart, you may.” The eunuch answered, ``I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.”"
NASB:
Personally, I like all the above translations.
A qeustion recently came up as to why Acts 8:37 isn't in the NIV.
All Bibles are translated from early Greek manuscripts. We know the originals were inspired from God and then people copied the originals and distributed the copies. We don't have any of the original letters, but we do have copies. Our goal is to see what the original writers said. When the copies were made some copiers made mistakes, some added "margin notes" to explain the text, others embellished the stories. This happened occasionally, though we have figured most of them out and any outstanding questions are not significant to our understanding of key doctrines. As these "margin notes" were not written by the original authors, we would doubt the inspiration of such verses, though they may be good statements. For the most part, bible scholars have been able to figure out (with great confidence) what is embellishment and what is authentic.
Acts 8:37 is potentially one of those verses that was added, but the verdict is still out on its authenticity. Many early manuscripts (our copies) do not have the verse while historically the verse has been received as authentic. So the question is "Was this verse added to make the verse more clear?" or another question, "Was this verse deleted for some reason in other manuscripts?" Frankly, we really don't know, so the original authenticity of this verse is in question.
KJV and NKJV translators, with good reason, have decided to put it in. The NIV people left it out, but put it as a margin note. Both are decisions of the publishers. Personally, I like what the NASB bible (the Bible I use) has done. The verse has been printed in full, but put into brackets, with a note stating that this verse is not contained in many early manuscripts.
Overall, the best course of action is to pick the "literal" translation of the Bible you are most comfortable with (all the above are good, along with the ESV), seek to understand what it says, apply it to your life, and deal with controversial issues as they come. Those who focus too much on "which Bible is the best" tend to forget why the Bible was given to us - so that we would know and obey the voice of God. January 23 Forgiving the GrudgeI have read a couple of things which make me think about the importance of forgiveness.
When we are offended we can deal with it in basically two ways: to forgive the person or to not forgive the person. If we don't forgive another person it will lead to bitterness in our lives. If we do forgive it will lead to joy and thankfulness.
One may think that there are other ways to deal with an offense other than forgiveness. I can forget what you have said, just pass over the way you offended me, and go on with my life. If you scorn the hard work I did for you I can just ignore it and go on with my life. But these ways lead us to resentment and bitterness because they don't deal with the anger that we feel toward the person. We can't just claim happiness for ourselves and ignore our own and the offenses of others. We bury the offenses like little seeds in the soul of our hearts. They will grow eventually. One offense is added to the first and so on, until a whole garden of weeds exists. This is how relationships are broken up. Relationship do not usually break apart with a big offense but with a bunch of small offenses that end up breaking the couple apart, or culminating in a large offense done in bitterness.
Forgiveness is different. Forgiveness deals with the anger. Forgiveness points out the anger that I feel in my heart. Anger tells the other person that you offended me and I am hurt ... but I give up any right to be bitter. I burn the seed in the oven of forgiveness so it will never produce the seed of bitterness. We throw the offense to the bottom of the sea and don't go scuba diving to bring it back up again. It is forgiven and forgotten.
If we learn to forgive we will have good friendships for what friend won't be offended? Forgivness makes true friendship possible because we will deal with the real combat of two people with selfish ambitions trying to come together to make a future together. It is give and take for the sake of a commitment made to one another.
This is how God dealt with His people. They had offended him and he forgave them. He did not ignore their faults, but he dealt directly with them, forgiving them in the death and resurrection of His Son Jesus Christ. "But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. " - Romans 5:8. He has dealt with all the offenses of every person who trusts Jesus Christ, the offenses are gone, He has sent them away, and they will not come up again in the future. That is true forgiveness.
“For if you forgive others for their transgressions, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. But if you do not forgive others, then your Father will not forgive your transgressions." - Matthew 6:14-15 Man in God's Image"Christianity then appeared with its central doctrine, that man was created in the Divine image, and destined for immortality; pronouncing that, in the eye of God, all men are equal. This asserted for the individual an independent value. It occasioned the great inference, that man is superior to the State, which ought to be fashioned for his use; ... that the state ought to exist for man; that justice, protection, and the common good, ought to be the aim of government."
- Quoted in Christian History of the Constitution, Rosalie J. Slater, pg. 2.
As Americans we may forget our roots, but we need to remember how novel this was in the founding of our nation. You mean the state serves the people? You bet. With Liberty for AllThis is a fantastic quote ...
"The greatest and most dangerous of depotisms is that beneath which the depraved inclination of human nature, the deadly influence of the world, namely, sin, miserably subjects the human conscience. There are, no doubt many countries, especially among those which the sun of Christianity has not yet illumined, that are without civil liberty, and that groan under the arbitrary rule of powerful masters. But, in order to become free outwardly, men must first succeed in being free inwardly. In the human heart the is a vast country to be delivered from slavery - abysses which man cannot cross alone, heights he cannot climb unaided, fortresses he cannot take, armies he cannot put to flight. In order to conquer in this moral battle, man must unite with One stonger than himself - with the Son of God."
- J.H. Merle D'Aubigne, History of the Reformation in Europe quoted in Teaching and Learning America's Christian History, Rosalie J. Slater, pp 159.
Two thoughts...
January 19 Jonathan Edwards LibraryI love Jonathan Edwards and it is nice that lots of his stuff is free. If you are interested in the works of Jonathan Edwards, you will be happy to know that they are available online for free at http://edwards.yale.edu/archive/
Check it out! Stem Cell ResearchIn the midst of the debate of embryonic stem cell research I came across a type of "embryonic stem cell research" that I have not been able to find reference to from a Christian ministry. It research done through a process called "parthenogenesis" (information can be found at bedfordresearch.org). I sent them an email asking if they created human beings to destroy them and they said "no" and that the "embryo" they use could never result in the development of a human infant. Could anyone give me some insight to the ethics of parthenogenesis?
Here is an exerpt of the letter they sent...
----
Spontaneous activation of eggs (parthenogenesis) is a relatively common occurence, and humans are no exception. With the exception of a few types of insects, development to an offspring cannot occur -- the contribution of sperm genes is essential for normal embryonic development. Hence, parthenogenesis is a well-studied system for developmental biologists to explore the roles of egg genes and sperm genes in the development of a new offspring. These studies are extraordinarily important for a number of reasons, including understanding the inability of some couples to conceive. In humans, eggs can activate spontaneously inside the ovary, or following release from the ovary without successful fertilization. Most such eggs die after a few cell cycles, but some can give rise to benign collections of cells described by pathologists as "dermoid cysts" and "teratomas." These cells do not have the paternal genes necessary for normal embryogenesis, but they can give rise to a variety of types of cells that can be supported and expanded in the laboratory. Unfortunately, due to confusion on the part of our federal legislators in the mid-90s, federal funding to study parthenotes is also totally restricted. Scientists must bear much of the responsibility for the confusion because we failed to mount an intense educational effort in the 1980's, the decade the United Kingdom debated the issues and developed guidelines their citizens could live with. Moreover, because of the failure of parthenotes to develop into normal embryos, some scientists believe they are not as valuable to the research right now as embryonic stem cells. As I stated in a 2004 article I wrote for the Connecticut Law School ("What is an embryo?") I feel strongly that the current debate in our country over the use of "left-over" embryos for stem cell derivation bespeaks a healthy society with genuine concern for all of its members. Moreover, since there is currently no examples of successful treatments with embryonic stem cells, it is all the more difficult for people who believe that life begins at fertilization to justify the destruction of embryos. One member of our Board of Trustees, Dr. Jose Cibelli, successfully derived a line of monkey parthenote stem cells in 2002. Only 24 monkey eggs were needed to derive this line of stem cells (Cyno-1) which is now being used by scientists all over the world studying diseases such as Parkinson's and diabetes. This work strongly supports our belief that human parthenote stem cells may prove therapeutically very valuable. The immediate goal is to develop the laboratory techniques to derive parthenote stem cells from young women with incurable diseases such as diabetes, or spinal cord injury, that can then be used to treat her own disease. This approach would not only avoid the destruction of embryos, but her parthenote stem cells could be a perfect tissue match for her, thus avoiding the tissue rejection problems well known for kidney and bone marrow transplants. If successful, this approach would also serve as "proof of principle" and could justify the enormous effort needed to derive the parthenote stem cells. Christian Character First
January 17 Leave Me a Message - just not a long one.I realized how much I could learn about leaving a good voice mail message through this web article.
Paul Jehle AudioLast weekend we had the opportunity of the year to have Paul Jehle come and speak to our congregation. He spoke primarily on parenting with four sessions. One session was dedicated to men (a practical view of fathering and grandparenting), he taught Sunday School and preached.
This was not just a conference for parents, but for anyone who wanted to understand the priorities of God through the Bible better.
The sermon was a feast for our congregation, calling us to consider our attitudes. The audio is available at www.nlicc.org/sermons.asp. I bet we are missing about 5-10 minutes at the start, but it is still worth listening to.
Larry Plating has audio for the whole conference. Get a copy from him and take time to listen. January 11 Happy Birthday to MeSome reflections on being 33...
|
|
|